The End of “Africa Rising”

For more than a decade, Africa Rising served as a reassuring shorthand in global conversations about the continent. It appeared in policy briefs, investment decks, conference panels, and diplomatic speeches, offering a counterpoint to earlier pessimistic framings. The expression gained particular traction in the early 2010s, following The Economist’s widely cited 2000 cover, “The Hopeless Continent,” a phrase that lingered in global discourse far longer than intended.

Yet today, Africa Rising no longer convinces. Not because Africa has failed to change, but because the narrative itself has failed to evolve. What once sounded corrective now feels static, too broad to capture lived realities, too abstract to inspire attachment, and too distant to generate desire.

The problem is no longer Africa’s image alone. It is the persistence of macro narratives that mistake aggregation for understanding.

‍

The Structural Weakness of Macro Narratives

Macro narratives operate by compression. They reduce diversity to averages, trajectories to curves, and societies to indicators. In doing so, they promise clarity, but at the cost of truth.

In the African context, this approach has always been particularly fragile. Africa is not a single market, culture, or historical path. It is a constellation of political systems, demographic dynamics, creative ecosystems, and temporalities that often move in parallel rather than in unison. Any narrative that claims to describe the continent as a whole inevitably flattens what makes it intelligible.

As philosopher Achille Mbembe has consistently argued in his work on postcolonial modernity, Africa has long been treated as an object of interpretation rather than a subject of expression. Macro narratives reproduce this distance. They speak about Africa rather than allowing Africa to be experienced on its own terms.

‍

From Explanation to Disconnection

The ambition of Africa Rising was explanatory. It sought to reassure external audiences, investors, institutions, governments, by translating Africa into familiar economic language. Growth rates, market size, demographic dividends became the dominant vocabulary.

But explanation does not necessarily create connection.

In a media environment shaped by immediacy, visual culture, and emotional resonance, abstraction struggles to compete with lived signals. People no longer relate to places through continental trajectories. They relate through atmospheres, scenes, moments, and concrete experiences.

This is why Africa Rising increasingly fails to translate into action. It informs, but it does not invite. It reassures, but it does not move.

‍

Why the Narrative Has Lost Credibility

Three forces have accelerated the erosion of Africa Rising as a persuasive framework.

First, the narrative is temporally misaligned. It was designed for long policy cycles and institutional reporting, not for a world governed by platforms, feeds, and real-time comparison. Macro narratives move slowly, perception today moves instantly.

Second, it is emotionally neutral. It lacks texture, tension, and personality. In an attention economy driven by affect and identification, neutrality is not balance, it is invisibility.

Third, it is increasingly contradicted by visible realities. Political instability, climate stress, inequality, and global economic volatility have complicated the idea of a smooth, linear ascent. A narrative that insists on optimism without acknowledging friction risks sounding disconnected rather than hopeful.

‍

The Shift From Narratives to Imaginaries

What is replacing macro narratives is not pessimism, but specificity.

People no longer respond to summaries. They respond to imaginaries, coherent sets of images, references, practices, and emotions that make a place intelligible and desirable. An imaginary does not explain, it attracts. It allows people to project themselves into a place rather than merely understand it.

This marks a fundamental shift for African countries. The challenge is no longer to be well described, but to be visually and culturally legible on their own terms.